second essential question

Filed under: Nicole — yhschildofmyheart at 2:16 pm on Tuesday, April 24, 2007



The second question being considered during this unit is: What does the way women are depicted in contemporary fiction say about our culture and identity? Evaluate the purpose of presenting women in this way in your novel.

The way women are depicted in Child of my Heart says that the society and culture suffer from women who tend to neglect important duties such as being positive role models, compassionate mothers, and retaining dignity. Some women in the novel, such as Daisy’s mother and Flora’s show that they are ineffective because of the neglect for their duties as mothers. Used in contrast to this Theresa is a positive figure in both Daisy and Flora’s lives. Theresa gives us hope that in a society full of broken families, and children hurt by ineffective mothers, there is always someone who cares. Theresa acts like an escape for both Daisy and Flora, hours spent with her are hours where they can be themselves and feel special. However, we also see that women are depicted as individuals who are extremely susceptible to temptation, and unfaithful. Anna the cook for Flora’s family constantly has affairs with the husband of the family, the artist. In turn, the artist’s wife is unfaithful, leaving for the city for weeks at a time. Also Theresa finds herself caught in the temptation with the old artist. This tells us that there are always two sides of the women in our culture. The purpose of Theresa in the novel is to show how every girl in our society should be treated, with respect and praise, so each girl can feel special, no matter what.

I felt surprised by the ending, what do you guys think? I thought it seemed sort of sudden, and a strange ending since we have seen Theresa, such a positive influence to the girls suddenly doing things no one expected. Thoughts?

Create a free edublog to get your own comment avatar (and more!)

4 Comments »

6

   Julia

April 24, 2007 @ 10:08 pm

Nicole, I have to say I agree with you about the ending. I did find it strange, however when you think about it, there are definitely some things throughout the book that hint towards her relations with the artist. I do think that this just goes to show how there are no completely dependable characters in this world, though. Although Theresa is a positive role model for the children, we see near the end of the book that she has another side. The way this is presented gives negative connotations about our culture, saying that even though people may appear positive and sincere, they are not always this way behind closed doors.

7

   katie

April 25, 2007 @ 6:22 am

I agree with Julia. I think the ending shows how people are influenced by our culture and that everyone has a side other than what people see. We see Theresa as a good role model and good person in general throughout the story and in the end our opinion of her is changed because of what she does. Theresa shows that people aren’t always what they seem to be. I agree with Julia that the story points out negative things about our culture. First it shows the neglectful mothers then in the end it shows how people are different than what they seem to be.

10

   yhsbutterflies

April 25, 2007 @ 7:07 pm

Nicole,
I was reading your comment and I think its really interesting how you talk about how the book says that women who neglect their hously, caring duties are what bring about the ruin of society. This is intersting because in the book I read, In the Time of the Butterflies, we have been talking about the double standard men hold for women. For example, when women neglect their duties, such as caring, having dignity, etc., their children suffer and society is lost without, say, the guiding hand of a female. However, if men are “lost” such as they have affairs or neglect their children or wife, they are not considered negative and hurtful, but rather distant or busy or “wandering.” Although it seems like the children in the book suffer because of their neglectful mother, I am wondering where their father was at the time and why he wasn’t considered neglectful as well. Basically, why do the women get the blame for raising their children poorly when the father should have just as equal a positive or negative influence on their lives.

11

   yhsbutterflies

April 25, 2007 @ 7:09 pm

Nicole,
I was reading your comment and I think its really interesting how you talk about how the book says that women who neglect their hously, caring duties are what bring about the ruin of society. This is intersting because in the book I read, In the Time of the Butterflies, we have been talking about the double standard men hold for women. For example, when women neglect their duties, such as caring, having dignity, etc., their children suffer and society is lost without, say, the guiding hand of a female. However, if men are “lost” such as they have affairs or neglect their children or wife, they are not considered negative and hurtful, but rather distant or busy or “wandering.” Although it seems like the children in the book suffer because of their neglectful mother, I am wondering where their father was at the time and why he wasn’t considered neglectful as well. Basically, why do the women get the blame for raising their children poorly when the father should have just as equal a positive or negative influence on their lives.

-chelsea e.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image